《PHILOSPHY OF LAW FIFTH EDITION》求取 ⇩

PART ONE: LAW1

Natural Law Theory7

Norman KretzmannLexIniusta Non EstLex:Laws on Trial in Aquinas’Court of Conscience7

Anthony D’AmatoOn the Connection Between Law and Justice19

Legal Positivism’s Challenge to Natural Law Theory31

John AustinA Positivist Conception of Law, from The Province of Jurisprudence Determined （1832）31

H.L.A.HartA More Recent Positivist Conception of Law, from The Concept of Law （1961）42

H.L.A.HartPositivism and the Separation of Law and Morals56

Lon L.FullerPositivism and Fidelity to Law—A Reply to Professor Hart73

Lon L.FullerEight Ways to Fail to Make Law, from The Morality of Law （1964）88

Joel FeinbergThe Dilemmas of Judges Who Must Interpret “Immoral Laws”91

The Moral Obligation to Obey the Law113

Martin Luther King, JrLetter from Birmingham Jail, from Why We Can’t Wait （1963）113

Joel FeinbergCivil Disobedience in the Modern World121

Other Leading Theories of the Nature of Law134

Ronald M.DworkinThe Model of Rules134

Riggs v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of New York, 1889151

Ronald M.DworkinNatural Law Revisited156

J.L.MackieThe Third Theory of Law162

O.W Holmes, JrThe Path of the Law168

Jerome FrankLegal Realism, from Law and the Modern Mind （1963）174

Andrew AltmanLegal Realism, Critical Legal Studies, and Dworkin176

PART TWO: LIBERTY192

The Case for Self-Determination198

John Stuart MillThe Liberal Argument, from On Liberty （1859）198

Challenges to Self-Determination: Legal Paternalism and Legal Moralism209

Gerald DworkinPaternalism, from Morality and the Law （1971）209

Gerald DworkinPaternalism: Some Second Thoughts, from Paternalism （1983）219

Patrick DevlinMorals and the Criminal Law, from The Enforcement of Morals （1965）223

Patrick DevlinMorals and Contemporary Social Reality, from The Enforcement of Morals （1965）229

Constitutional Privacy238

Griswold v. ConnecticutUnited States Supreme Court, 1965238

Roe v. WadeUnited States Supreme Court, 1973243

Planned Parenthood of S.E.Pennsylvania v. CaseyUnited States Supreme Court, 1992247

Bowers v. HardwickUnited States Supreme Court, 1986251

Freedom of Expression and Its Limits262

Joel FeinbergLimits to the Free Expression of Opinion262

Cohen v. CaliforniaUnited States Supreme Court, 1971277

Village of Skokie v. National Socialist Party ofAmericaSupreme Court of Illinois, 1978281

Texas v. JohnsonUnited States Supreme Court, 1989285

Thomas C.GreyCivil Rights Versus Civil Liberties: The Case of Discriminatory Verbal Harassment294

Principles of Constitutional Interpretation311

Robert H·BorkThe Right of Privacy: The Construction of a Constitutional Time Bomb, from The Tempting of America （1990）311

John Hart ElyDiscovering Fundamental Values, from Democracy and Distrust （1980）314

David LyonsConstitutional Interpretation and Original Meaning329

PART THREE: JUSTICE344

The Machinery of Justice: Three Sample Procedural Problems349

John H.LangbeinTorture and Plea Bargaining349

Kent GreenawaltJury Nullification, from Conflicts ofLaw and Morality（1987）359

Gerald DworkinThe Serpent Beguiled Me and I Did Eat: Entrapment and the Creation of Crime364

Justice and Compensation374

Richard PosnerThe Concept of Corrective Justice in Recent Theories of Tort Law374

Jules ColemanCorrective Justice and Wrongful Gain385

Justice and Contract397

Charles FriedContract As Promise, from Contract As Promise（1981）397

Robin FoxBabies for Sale: Reflections on the Baby M Case408

Bonnie SteinbockSurrogate Motherhood as Prenatal Adoption421

Justice, Affirmative Action, and Racial Quotas429

Thomas NagelEqual Treatment and Compensatory Discrimination429

Thomas E.Hill, JrThe Message of Affirmative Action436

Legal Injustices to Women451

Kim Lane ScheppeleThe Reasonable Woman451

State v. RuskCourt of Appeals of Maryland, 1981456

Regina v. MorganHouse of Lords, 1976459

State v.KellySupreme Court of New Jersey, 1984462

Larry May and John C.HughesIs Sexual Harassment Coercive? from Moral Rights in the Workplace （1987）466

Ellen Frankel PaulBared Buttocks and Federal Cases470

Michael M.v. Superior Court of Sonoma CountyUnited States Supreme Court, 1981474

PART FOUR: RESPONSIBILITY482

Responsibility for Results487

H.L.A.Hart and A.M.HonoreCausation and Responsibility, from Causation in the Law （1959）487

Palsgraf v. The Long Island Railroad CoNew York Court of Appeals, 1928499

Robert E.KeetonThe Basic Rule of Legal Cause in Negligence Cases, from Legal Cause in the Law of Torts （1963）505

Judith Jarvis ThomsonThe Decline of Cause512

Richard ParkerBlame, Punishment, and the Role of Result520

Responsibility for Nonintervention527

Thomas Babington MacaulayNotes on the Indian Penal Code, from Works ofLordMacaulay（1866）527

John KleinigGood Samaritanism529

Some Criminal Defenses533

People v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals, 1962533

Lon L.FullerThe Case of the Speluncean Explorers535

Anthony D’AmatoThe Speluncean Explorers:Further Proceedings549

People v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals, 1986554

Sanford H.Kadish and Stephen J.SchulhoferThe Case of Lady Eldon’s French Lace557

The M’Naghten RulesHouse of Lords, 1843561

The American Law InstituteThe Insanity Defense, from Model Penal Code（1956）563

Hyman GrossMental Abnormality as a Criminal Excuse, from A Theory ofCriminalJustice（1979）566

State v. GuidoNew Jersey Supreme Court, 1963575

Joel FeinbergTwo Views of the Psychopathic Personality576

PART FIVE: PUNISHMENT585

What Is Legal Punishment?592

Joel FeinbergThe Expressive Function of Punishment, from Doing and Deserving（1970）592

Igor PrimoratzPunishment as Language602

What, If Anything, Justifies Legal Punishment?613

Joel FeinbergThe Classic Debate613

C.L.TenFantastic Counterexamples and the Utilitarian Theory, from Crime, Guilt, andPunishment（1987）618

Michael S.MooreThe Moral Worth of Retribution632

John RawlsPunishment, from Two Concepts ofRules654

Victims’ Rights: Restitution or Vengeance?660

Randy E.BarnettRestitution: A New Paradigm of Criminal Justice660

Robert NozickRetributive Punishment, from Philosophical Explanations （1981）674

J.L.MackieRetributivism: A Test Case for Ethical Objectivity677

Jeffrie G.MurphyGetting Even: The Role of the Victim685

Payne v. TennesseeUnited States Supreme Court, 1990696

David R.DowWhen Law Bows to Politics: Explaining Paynev.Tennessee713

The Death Penalty723

Furman v. GeorgiaUnited States Supreme Court, 1972723

Woodson v. North CarolinaUnited States Supreme Court, 1976732

Ernest van den HaagIn Defense of the Death Penalty: A Practical and Moral Analysis742

Stephen NathansonShould We Execute Those Who Deserve to Die? from An Eyeforan Eye:TheMoralityofPunishing by Death（1987）748