《PHIL OSOPHY OF LAW THIRD EDITION》求取 ⇩

PART 1 Law1

THE NATURE AND VALIDITY OF LAW11

Concerning the Nature of Law, from Summa TheologicaTHOMAS AQUINAS11

Natural Law and English Positivism, from Traditions of CivilityERNEST BARKER24

A Positivist Conception of Law, from The Province of Jurisprudence DeterminedJOHN AUSTIN26

The Dynamic Aspect of Law, from Pure Theory of LawHANS KELSEN38

A Realist Conception of Law, from The Nature and Sources of the LawJOHN CHIPMAN GRAY44

A New Conception of Law, from The Concept of LawH.L.A.HART54

LAW AND MORALITY69

Positivism and the Separation of Law and MoralsH.L.A.HART69

Positivism and Fidelity to Law—A Reply to Professor HartLON L.FULLER88

Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy, from RechtphilosophieGUSTAV RADBRUCH109

The Problem of the Grudge Informer, from The Morality of LawLON L.FULLER111

THE OBLIGATION TO OBEY THE LAW115

Civil Disobedience, from A Theory of JusticeJOHN RAWLS115

Civil Disobedience in the Modern WorldJOEL FEINBERG129

LAW AND THE JUDICIAL DECISION143

Problems of Legal Reasoning, from The Encyclopedia of PhilosophyH.L.A.HART143

The Model of RulesRONALD M.DWORKIN149

The Third Theory of LawJ.L.MACKIE167

Is There Really No Right Answer in Hard Cases? from A Matter of PrincipleRONALD M.DWORKIN174

PART 2 Liberty193

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION206

On Liberty, from On LibertyJOHN STUART MILL206

Limits to the Free Expression of OpinionJOEL FEINBERG217

Morals Offenses and the Model Penal CodeLOUIS B.SCHWARTZ233

（United States Supreme Court, 1971）COHEN v.CALIFORNIA242

Pornography, Obscenity, and the Case for CensorshipIRVING KRISTOL246

SELF-DETERMINATION: LEGAL PATERNALISM AND LEGAL MORALISM253

（Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1971）JOHN F.KENNEDY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL v.HESTON253

（District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1972）IN THE MATTER OF OSBORNE256

Paternalism, from Morality and the LawGERALD DWORKIN258

Paternalism: Some Second Thoughts, from PaternalismGERALD DWORKIN268

Morals and the Criminal Law, from The Enforcement of MoralsPATRICK DEVLIN273

（Virginia District Court, 1976）DOE v.COMMONWEALTH’S ATTORNEY FOR CITY OF RICHMOND279

Sexual Autonomy and the Constitutional Right to PrivacyDAVID A.J.RICHARDS282

PRIVACY285

The Invitation to Dinner Case, from The Legal ProcessHENRY M.HART, JR., AND ALBERT M.SACKS285

（United States Supreme Court, 1965）GRISWOLD v.CONNECTICUT286

Privacy and Autonomy, from Nomos ⅩⅢ, PrivacyHYMAN GROSS291

Privacy, Morality, and the LawW.A.PARENT297

RIGHTS308

Rights and Jural Relations, from Fundamental Legal ConceptionsWESLEY NEWCOMB HOHFELD308

The Correlativity of Rights and DutiesDAVID LYONS319

A New Conception of Human Rights, from Human RightsCARL WELLMAN325

PART 3 Justice333

THE NATURE OF JUSTICE344

On the Connection Between Justice and Utility, from UtilitarianismJOHN STUART MILL344

Comparative Justice, from Social PhilosophyJOEL FEINBERG356

Fairness and Justice, from A Theory of JusticeJOHN RAWLS370

Distributive Justice, from Anarchy, State, and UtopiaROBERT NOZICK383

JUSTICE AND COMPENSATION399

The Concept of Corrective Justice in Recent Theories of Tort LawRICHARD POSNER399

Corrective Justice and Wrongful GainJULES COLEMAN411

JUSTICE AND CONTRACT423

Contract Law and Distributive JusticeANTHONY T.KRONMAN423

Contract As Promise, from Contract As PromiseCHARLES FRIED438

DISCRIMINATION AND REVERSE DISCRIMINATION450

Is the Favoring of Women and Blacks in Employment and Educational Opportunities Justified?LOUIS KATZNER450

Reverse Discrimination As UnjustifiedLISA H.NEWTON456

The Justification of Reverse Discrimination, from Social Justice and Preferential TreatmentTOM LBEAUCHAMP459

PART 4 Responsibility467

THE IDEA OF RESPONSIBILITY474

Responsibility, from Punishment and ResponsibilityH.L.A.HART474

RESPONSIBILITY AND CAUSATION483

Causation and Responsibility, from Causation in the LawH.L.A.HART AND A.M.HONORE483

The Basic Rule of Legal Cause in Negligence Cases, from Legal Cause in the Law of TortsROBERT E.KEETON496

（New York Times, February 7, 1968）THE AMBIGUOUS SUICIDE CASE504

（New York Court of Appeals, 1928）PALSGRAF v.THE LONG ISLAND RAILROAD CO.505

FAULT512

Sua Culpa, from Doing and Deserving:Essays in the Theory of ResponsibilityJOEL FEINBERG512

THE DILEMMA OF THE BAD SAMARITAN528

Notes on the Indian Penal Code, from Works of Lord MacaulayTHOMAS BABINGTON MACAULAY528

The Moral and Legal Responsibility of the Bad SamaritanJOEL FEINBERG530

“MENTAL ELEMENT” REQUIREMENTS543

Eliminating Responsibility, from Crime and the Criminal LawBARBARA WOOTTON543

Changing Conceptions of Responsibility, from The Morality of the Criminal LawH.L.A.HART558

Mental Abnormality As a Criminal Excuse, from A Theory of Criminal JusticeHYMAN GROSS569

After Hinckley: New Directions for the Insanity DefenseDAVID B.WEXLER578

PART 5 Punishment587

WHAT IS PUNISHMENT?603

（United States Supreme Court, 1960）FLEMMING v.NESTOR603

THE CLASSIC DEBATE: RETRIBUTIVISM AGAINST UTILITARIANISM612

Hegel’s Theory of PunishmentJ.ELLIS McTAGGART612

Retributivism: A Test Case for Ethical ObjectivityJ.L.MACKIE622

Marxism and RetributionJEFFRIE G.MURPHY630

Punishment in the Spirit of Utilitarianism, from ResponsibilityJONATHAN GLOVER643

Culpability and DesertHYMAN GROSS646

PunishmentJOHN RAWLS654

PUNISHMENT AND REHABILITATION659

Persons and PunishmentHERBERT MORRIS659

DETAINING THE DANGEROUS OFFENDER672

On Incapacitating the DangerousFERDINAND D.SCHOEMAN672

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT681

（United States Supreme Court, 1972）FURMAN v.GEORGIA681

（United States Supreme Court, 1976）GREGG v.GEORGIA690

（United States Supreme Court, 1977）COKER v.GEORGIA697

Capital Punishment: The Unexamined Issue of Special DeterrenceROBERT BARTELS705