《Table 3Details of procedure after successful biliary cannulation.》
本系列图表出处文件名:随高清版一同展现
《"Comparison of efficacy and safety of transpancreatic septotomy, needle-knife fistulotomy or both based on biliary cannulation unintentional pancreatic access and papillary morphology"》
TPS:transpancreatic septotomy;NKF:needle-knife fistulotomy;EST:endoscopic sphincterotomy;EPBD:endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with balloon dilatation;CBD:common bile duct.
The final analysis included 157 patients undergoing precut sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation,113(72.0%)underwent TPS,36(22.9%)underwent NKF and 8(5.1%)underwent TPS&NKF(Fig.2).The demographics and indications for ERCP are summarized in Table 1 according to the type of precut technique.The three groups were comparable regarding age,sex,indications,previous failed ERCP and potentially patient-and procedurerelated risk factors for post-ERCP complications,except for multiple pancreatic cannulation(P<0.001).Prophylactic pancreatic stenting was only administered in 5 patients(3.2%),of whom 4(3.5%)in the TPS group and 1(12.5%)in the TPS&NKF group,without significant difference among groups.
图表编号 | XD0031655100 严禁用于非法目的 |
---|---|
绘制时间 | 2019.02.15 |
作者 | Jun Wen、Tao Li、Yi Lu、Li-Ke Bie、Biao Gong |
绘制单位 | Digestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine、Digestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine、Diges |
更多格式 | 高清、无水印(增值服务) |