《Methodologies of Legal Research》求取 ⇩

1.Legal Doctrine： Which Method（s） for What Kind of Discipline？Mark Van Hoecke1

Ⅰ. Historical Developments1

Ⅱ. What Kind of Discipline is Legal Doctrine？4

Ⅲ. Which Methodology for Legal Research？11

Ⅳ. Conclusion17

2.The Method of a Truly Normative Legal ScienceJaap Hage19

Ⅰ. Preliminaries20

Ⅱ. The Possibility of a Normative Science28

Ⅲ. The Method of a Truly Normative Legal Science40

Ⅳ. Conclusion43

3.Explanatory Non-Normative Legal Doctrine. Taking the Distinction between Theoretical and Practical Reason SeriouslyAnne Ruth Mackor45

Ⅰ. Introduction45

Ⅱ. Theoretical and Practical Reason46

Ⅲ. Explanatory Legal Doctrine48

Ⅳ. Normative Legal Doctrine58

Ⅴ. Conclusion69

4.A World without Law ProfessorsMathias M Siems71

Ⅰ. Introduction71

Ⅱ. Legal Training and Education72

Ⅲ. Legal Research and Writing78

Ⅳ. Analysis： What Next ？85

5.Open or Autonomous？ The Debate on Legal Methodology as a Reflection of the Debate on LawPauline C Westerman87

Ⅰ. Introduction87

Ⅱ. The Problem of the Lacking Third88

Ⅲ. Legal System as Theoretical Framework90

Ⅳ. Legal Doctrine and Legal Science94

Ⅴ. The Quest for Ongoing Abstraction95

Ⅵ. Empty Autonomy97

Ⅶ. Revenge of Reality101

Ⅷ. The Need for an Empirical Orientation105

Ⅸ. An Empirical Legal Doctrine？108

6.Methodology of Legal Doctrinal Research： A Comment on WestermanJan Vranken111

Ⅰ. Introduction111

Ⅱ. The Identity of Subject and Theoretical Framework： Four Objections114

Ⅲ. Methodological Consequences118

7.The Epistemological Function of ‘la Doctrine’Horatia Muir W123

Ⅰ. On the Choice， as a Topic， of the Epistemological FunctionPlayed Out in French Legal Tradition by ‘la Doctrine’123

Ⅱ. The Current Debates over the Existence and Future of ‘la Doctrine’ and why they are Significant125

Ⅲ. How the Emergence of ‘la Doctrine’ is Linked to the Decline of the Code and the Massification of ‘la Jurisprudence’126

Ⅳ. How the Changing Relationship between Law and the other Social Sciences is Relevant to the Rise of ‘la Doctrine’ and to the Subsequent Shaping of Legal Knowledge128

Ⅴ. Why ‘la Doctrine’ is Threatened Today in its Interpretative Function129

Ⅵ. Why the Current Crisis may be for the Better- and may be Good for Comparative Legal Research131

8.Maps， Methodologies and Critiques： Confessions of a Contract LawyerRoger Brownsword133

Ⅰ. Introduction133

Ⅱ. An Ideological Understanding of Adjudication and of Contract Law135

Ⅲ. The Rationality of Contract Law137

Ⅳ. The Underlying Ethic of Contract Law139

Ⅴ. The Fit between Doctrine and Business Organisation143

Ⅵ. The Consent-Based Nature of Contractual Obligation145

Ⅶ. The Mission of Protecting Reasonable Expectations146

Ⅷ. Contract and the Larger Regulatory Environment148

Ⅸ. Conclusion152

9.Legal Research and the Distinctiveness of Comparative LawJohn Bell155

Ⅰ. Introduction： Legal Research as a Normative Social Science155

Ⅱ. Hermeneutic Approach to Legal Research158

Ⅲ. The Institutional Character of Law161

Ⅳ. The Interpretative Character of Law164

Ⅴ Implications for Comparative Law167

Ⅵ . Conclusion175

10 . Does One Need an Understanding of Methodology in Law Before One Can Understand Methodology in Comparative Law？Geoffrey Samuel177

Ⅰ.The Problem of Interdisciplinarity178

Ⅱ. Methodology and the Status of Comparative Law182

Ⅲ. Methodology and Epistemology in the Social Sciences188

Ⅳ. Methodology and Epistemology in Law192

Ⅴ. Positivism （Causality） Versus Hermeneutics194

Ⅵ. Positivism （Causality） Versus Dialectics198

Ⅶ. Positivism versus Actionalism and Objectification200

Ⅷ. Paradigm Authoritarianism Versus Comparative Studies205

11. Comparative Law， Legal Linguistics and Methodology of Legal DoctrineJaakko Husa209

Ⅰ.Introduction209

Ⅱ. Background of Functionalism212

Ⅲ. From Rabel to Zweigert and Kotz215

Ⅳ. Legal Languages and Functionalism223

Ⅴ. Conclusion227

12. Doing What Doesn’t Come Naturally. On the Distinctiveness of Comparative LawMaurice Adams229

Ⅰ.‘Doing’ Law is Immutably Comparative229

Ⅱ.‘And Yet it Moves！’230

Ⅲ. Explanatory Comparative Law and Interdisciplinarity235

Ⅳ To Conclude239

13. Promises and Pitfalls of Interdisciplinary Legal Research： The Case of Evolutionary Analysis in LawBart Du Laing241

Ⅰ.Introduction241

Ⅱ. Contemporary Evolutionary Approaches to Human Behaviour and Evolutionary Analysis in Law244

Ⅲ. Taxonomising Evolutionary Analyses in Law： Three Questions248

14. Behavioural Economics and Legal ResearchJulie De Coninck257

Ⅰ.Introduction257

Ⅱ. Behavioural Economics258

Ⅲ. Behavioural Law and Economics262

Ⅳ. Closing Remarks275

15. Theory and Object in Law： the Case for Legal Scholarship as Indirect SpeechBert Van Roermund277

Ⅰ.Legal Scholarship Pre-Determined by the Law it Investigates？278

Ⅱ. Theoretical Language as Meta-Language？282

Ⅲ. Some Implications284

Index287