《POLIICAL JUDGMENT》求取 ⇩

ONE WHAT IS POLITICAL JUDGMENT?1

Why we should inquire1

The concept of judgment in the history of political philosophy: brief survey4

Scope of the inquiry6

How to proceed8

TWO POSSIBLE AVENUES OF INQUIRY11

Arendt: politics and the appeal to Kantian aesthetics12

Gadamer: hermeneutics and the appeal to Aristotelian ethics19

Habermas: an ethics of communication25

THREE KANT'S CONCEPT OF TASTE31

Transcendental philosophy and the judging subject32

Taste, aesthetic and political34

Aesthetic judgment and moral respect59

From taste to politics: Kant's rejection of prudence63

FOUR ARISTOTLE'S CONCEPT OF PRUDENCE72

Judging and judging-with: sympathy as an essential moment of judgment72

Judgment and friendship79

FIVE JUDGMENT AND RHETORIC83

Aristotle: deliberation, rhetoric, and judgment83

Kant: judgment versus rhetoric97

SIX WITH SYMPATHY AND DETACHMENT: HORIZONS OF A COMPREHENSIVE PERSPECTIVE102

Formal and substantive conditions of judgment103

Judgment and responsibility109

Friendship versus love: Arendt and the Eichmann case119

Storytelling and narrative truth125

SEVEN TOWARDS A THEORY OF POLITICAL JUDGMENT129

Practices130

Persons135

Communities138

Means, ends, and identity144

EIGHT CLOSING REFLECTIONS153

NOTES168

BIBLIOGRAPHY188

INDEX194