《Table 1 Scales and studies in the meta-analysis》

《Table 1 Scales and studies in the meta-analysis》   提示:宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名:随高清版一同展现
《Empathy assessment in healthcare students is highly heterogeneous: A systematic review and meta-analysis(2012-2016)》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户?点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户?点击这里登录

The overall meta-analytic mean of Cronbach’s alpha is 0.805(95%CI 0.786-0.823)(Figure 3A) .The distribution of the alpha coefficients is shown in Figure 3B.There is heterogeneity(I2=98%)and publication bias is possibly present,as shown with partial asymmetry in the funnel plot(Figure 3C).However,Egger’s and Begg’s tests are not significant(P=0.076 and P=0.648,respectively).The average alpha coefficients per scale are shown in Table 2.Trim and fill funnel analysis,indicated that most likely 11 studies more are unpublished due to publication bias and this is significant(P<0.05).The scale with lowest Cronbach’s alpha is the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale(0.720)and the one with the highest Cronbach’s alpha is theCaring Behaviour Inventory tool(0.921).