《Table 1 Nerve conduction velocity and gastrocnemius muscle strength after bio-sleeve suture or epin

  提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式

本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现

《Repair of peripheral nerve defects by nerve transposition using small gap bio-sleeve suture with different inner diameters at both ends》

1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录

1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

*P<0.05，vs.sham operation group（one-way analysis of variance and the least significant difference test）.Data are expressed as the mean±SD（n=6 per group）.

There was no significant difference in wet muscle weight between the epineurial neurorrhaphy group and bio-sleevesuture group（P>0.05）.However，wet muscle weight was significantly lower in the epineurial neurorrhaphy and biosleeve suture groups than in the sham operation group（P<0.05；Table 2）.Varying degrees of gastrocnemius muscle atrophy were observed on the surgical side in the epineurial neurorrhaphy and bio-sleeve suture groups compared with the sham operation group（Figure 3）.In the sham operation group，hematoxylin-eosin staining showed that the muscle fibers had clear boundaries，uniform dyeing，and uniform diameter in muscle tissue cross-sections.The uniformity of diameter of muscle fibers on the surgical side was worse than that of normal muscle.The cross-sectional area of muscles was significantly lower in the epineurial neurorrhaphy and bio-sleeve suture groups than in the sham operation group（P<0.05）.There was no significant difference in cross-section area of muscle tissue between the epineurial neurorrhaphy and bio-sleeve suture groups（P>0.05）.