《Table 4.As in Table 2 but for Daxing station.》

《Table 4.As in Table 2 but for Daxing station.》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Subdaily to Seasonal Change of Surface Energy and Water Flux of the Haihe River Basin in China: Noah and Noah-MP Assessment》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录
Notes:all correlation coefficients passed the 95%confidence test.The MBE and RMSE are inC.

The simulated daily soil temperature and moisture at the depths of 10 and 40 cm at Daxing station were validated against observations（Fig.8）.Generally，the LSMs appropriately capture the seasonal variations of the soil temperatures，with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.96 to 0.97（Table 4）.However，the simulated soil temperature magnitudes are much larger than the observed data（with RMSE ranging from 2.71?C to 3.40?C）.The offline simulations always present higher（lower）soil temperatures in summer（winter）than the observations.This phenomenon is even distinct in the deeper soil layer.It is important to note that Noah-MP shows some improved skill in the summer soil temperature simulations，while the winter soil temperature simulations are comparable with Noah（Fig.8b）.

图表编号XD0030265000    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.01.10
作者Fuqiang YANG、Li DAN、Jing PENG、Xiujing YANG、Yueyue LI、Dongdong GAO
绘制单位Key Laboratory of Regional Climate-Environment for Temperate East Asia,Institute of Atmospheric Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences、University of Chinese Academy of Sciences、Key Laboratory of Regional Climate-Environment for Temperate East Asia,Institute
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《表2 锦屏二级水电站大理岩力学参数Table 2 mechanical parameter of marble for Jinping II hydropower station》2018.02.01
  2. 《表3 地铁车站火灾安全评价表Table 3 Fire safety assessment table for subway station》2018.06.25
  3. 《Table 1 Information for meteorological and rainfall stations》2019.03.01
  4. 《Table 1 Basic information of the hydrological stations located in the LRB》2019.02.01
  5. 《Table 3.Same as table 2 but for Hato (No.1713)》2019.03.01
  6. 《Table 1.Water quality at the stations (in situ measurement)》2019.01.01
  7. 《Table 5.As in Table 2 but for Guantao station.》2019.01.10
  8. 《Table 3.As in Table 2 but for Huailai station.》2019.01.10
  9. 《Table 2 PAR data in December,2015 at the Sub-Center for Atmosphere station》2017.03.01
  10. 《Table 1 Weibull parameters for daily extreme wind gusts with fitted curves for 12 typical stations》2018.10.01
  11. 《Table 2 Differences of the mean and maximum values for combinations of starting indices at stations in northern China》2018.04.01
  12. 《Table 4 Differences of the mean and maximum values for combinations of length indices at stations in northern China》2018.04.01
  13. 《Table 3 Differences of the mean and maximum values for combinations of ending indices at stations in northern China》2018.04.01
  14. 《表3 定点台站基本信息统计表Tab.3 Statistical table of basic information for fixex stations》2018.07.01
  15. 《Table 4.Summary of the GF at the study stations for the wind speed regime between 2 and 6 m s-1.Daytime:1000–1600 LST (l》2018.03.10
  16. 《表2 4个监测站点天然牧草营养成分Table 2 Nutrients of natural herbage in four stations》2018.08.20
  17. 《表6 不同方案下乌拉斯台站径流的预测结果Table 6 Runoff prediction errors for Wulasitai Station by different methods》2018.08.01
  18. 《表5 乌拉斯台站径流RBF神经网络预测结果Table 5 Runoff predictions for Wulasitai Station by RBF neural network》2018.08.01
  19. 《表3 乌拉斯台径流预报因子的优选结果Table 3 Optimized predictors for runoff at Wulasitai Station》2018.08.01
  20. 《表2 直传模式地球站可见性概率Table 2 Visibility probability of earth station in direct transmission mode》2018.04.01

随机翻阅

《表2 老年髋部脆性骨折患者衰弱影响因素的二分类Logistic回归分析（例）》 《表2：各潜变量测量项目的因子载荷与交叉载荷系数》 《表1 染料对溶液MS值的影响》 《表4 2007-2016长江经济带下游区域先进制造业偏离分量动态分析》 《表1 纯水比定压热容的实验测量值与文献值的比较》 《表4 巴斯铁列克钨多金属矿矽卡岩矿物电子探针分析结果 (w (B) /%)》 《表1 放大因子分布假设检验的P值》 《表1 术后随访3个月、0.5年的Barthel指数评分比较 (±s)》 《表3 控制与指令变量对应温度显示值测试结果》 《表5 两个机组在供热状态时的参数》