《Table 1 The proportional ratio between samples outside and inside the shelter belt for each grain s

《Table 1 The proportional ratio between samples outside and inside the shelter belt for each grain s   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Comparison of two classification methods to identify grain size fractions of aeolian sediment》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录
Note:PO is the average proportion of samples outside the shelter belt，PI is the average proportion of samples inside the shelter belt.Grey shade reflects a better grain size fraction for each grain size data sequence.

Because smaller wind speed is located in the shelter belt compared to that outside the shelter belt（Cheng et al.，2015），the proportion of grain size fraction uc would go down correspondingly in the shelter belt，while the proportion of grain size fractions uf and

图表编号XD0023782800    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.10.01
作者YanZai Wang、YongQiu Wu、MeiHui Pan、RuiJie Lu
绘制单位College of Geography and Tourism, Chongqing Normal University、State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Process and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University、Engineering Center of Desertification and Blown-Sand Control, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 2 Sampling sites and mineral associations of the granitoids in the Hazhu area》2020.06.01
  2. 《表4 粘结样品与烧结样品的键合拉力对比Table 4 Comparison of the bond pull between the bonded samples and sintered samples》2018.05.15
  3. 《Table 2.Ratios between observed and simulated crop yields under different ranges of the Standardized Precipitation Evapo》2018.07.16
  4. 《Table 1 Distribution of starch contents in the samples of the calibration set and validation set》2018.10.01
  5. 《Table 1 Fat contents in the samples of the calibration set and validation set》2018.08.01
  6. 《Table 1 Changes in the degree of opening to the outside world in Guizhou during 2006-2018》2019.07.01
  7. 《Table 2 The amount and proportion of subsidies in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei》2019.01.30
  8. 《Table 3–Adhesion free energies (mJ/m2) at contact between the membrane and the various sludge samples.》2019.03.15
  9. 《Table 1 Change of potential (E/V) for the ratios of 5∶5, 3∶7 and 7∶3 between L-His and D-His》2019.02.10
  10. 《Table 4 The area proportion of each forest type and UWCQ in each elevation class》2018.12.24
  11. 《Table 2 The proportional ratio between sandy paleosol samples and sand samples for each grain size fraction extracted by》2018.10.01
  12. 《Table 2 The levels of total Gh, AGh and AGh/total Gh ratio in the groups》2018.05.18
  13. 《表1 2 2013年实证样本RATIO及ROA变化情况Tab.12 The changes of empirical samples’ROA and RATIO in 2013》2018.06.20
  14. 《Table 5Distribution of patients proportion and severe morbidity in the PREPARE risk categories, comparing our results wi》2018.12.15
  15. 《Table 1Variables included in PREPARE and proportion of patients from our sample who received points according to corresp》2018.12.15
  16. 《Table 3The positive ratio of metabolic syndrome between the non-obese and obese NAFLD subjects.》2018.02.01
  17. 《Table 2.Composition of VOCs and their proportions in the box-model setup.The numbers in the table represent the ratio be》2018.11.10
  18. 《表1 样本的控制区基因序列与近似物种同源序列的比对结果Table 1 Comparison between Control region sequence of the sample and homologous sequence of t》2018.04.20
  19. 《表7 分区域事故数与“低风险”船舶比重的相关分析Table 7 Correlation between the accidents numbers and the ratio of the low-risk ships in various》2018.06.25
  20. 《Table 2Frequency of PCEMNs in 1 000 PCE, ratio between number of polycromatic and normocromatic erythrocytes and percent》2018.06.01

随机翻阅

《表1 两组患者干预前后FPG、2 h PBG水平对比对比（mmol/L,±s)》 《表2 4C装置各个类别部件检测准确率》 《表5 2组患者不良反应情况比较》 《表2 两组患者的多导睡眠监测结果比较》 《表3 播期、栽插方式对南粳9108成熟期干物质积累的影响》 《表1 描述性统计：避税活动影响企业成本粘性吗》 《表2 手术部位感染年龄分布及其危险等级》 《表1 现行国家及行业标准中与老年建筑相关的标准》 《表1 两组术后VAS比较 (±s, 分, n=40)》 《表2 对比观察组和对照组治疗后的住院时间、MV用时、感染控制用时和空腹血糖 ()》