《Table 2 Calculation results of DEA efficiency of agricultural listed companies》

《Table 2 Calculation results of DEA efficiency of agricultural listed companies》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Study of Efficiency of Agricultural Listed Companies Based on DEA Model》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

Based on the selected input and output indicator data of the agricultural listed companies in 2016，the data were brought into the model and DEAP 2.1 software was used to calculate the overall efficiencyα*of the 20 agricultural listed companies in 2016 and the pure technical efficiencyβ*and pure scale efficiencyλ*，the results were shown in Table 2.

图表编号XD00182592200    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.06.01
作者Maozhang HOU、Lingying LI
绘制单位Bangor College,Central South University of Forestry and Technology、Hunan Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Risk Management and Control Techniques for Innovative Enterprises、College of Economics,Central South University of Forestry and Technology
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 2 Results of agricultural total factor productivity in 27 provinces during 2013 and 2017》2018.11.01
  2. 《Table 3 The four types of agricultural production efficiency in Taiwan》2018.07.01
  3. 《Table 6 The evaluation results of primary indexes of Hunan agricultural industry safety》2018.03.01
  4. 《Table 5Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results of Hunan agricultural industry safety》2018.03.01
  5. 《Table 1 Scaling results of propeller efficiency》2019.08.01
  6. 《表2 各个决策单元效率指数的DEA评价结果Tab.2 DEA evaluation results of the efficiency of each decision-mak-ing unit》2019.02.15
  7. 《Table 2.Calculation results of the optimum index factor》2019.01.01
  8. 《表3 示范县休闲农业效率评价结果Tab.3 Evaluation results of leisure agriculture efficiency of demonstration counties》2019.02.10
  9. 《表1 河南省各地市农业循环经济效率结果Tab.1 Results of agricultural circular economic efficiency in various cities of Henan province》2018.06.15
  10. 《表2 2002~2016年的黑龙江省垦区农业科技创新的投入相对效率Table 2 The relative input efficiency of agricultural scientific and technological inno》2018.08.31
  11. 《表2 方法效能验证结果Table 2 Verification results of method efficiency》2018.06.25
  12. 《表1 传统方法计算结果与计算效率随模型变量的变化Tab.1 Calculation results and efficiency vs.model variables of traditional method》2018.10.01
  13. 《表2 本文方法计算结果与计算效率随模型变量的变化Tab.2 Calculation results and efficiency vs.model variables of proposed method》2018.10.01
  14. 《表2 环渤海地区城市代谢效率计算结果Tab.2 The calculation results of urban metabolic efficiencies in Bohai Rim region》2018.01.16
  15. 《表3 农产品物流投入、产出指标DEA有效目标值Table 3 DEA effective target value of input-output index of agricultural product logistics》2018.05.05
  16. 《表2 非DEA有效决策单元投入产出松弛变量Table 2 Input-output relaxation variables of non-DEA efficient decision making units》2018.05.05
  17. 《表2 充电站固定电价下集中式算法与分散式算法计算效率对比Table 2 Calculation efficiency comparison of fixed price for charging station between centra》2018.01.10
  18. 《表2 Bootstrap-DEA和DEA效率值的非参数检验结果Table 2 Non-parametric tests of Bootstrap-DEA and DEA efficiency》2018.10.15
  19. 《Table 6:Comparison of Growth-Oriented and Quality/Efficiency-Oriented Agricultural Policies》2018.05.08
  20. 《表2 计算结果对比表Table 2 Comparison table of calculation results》2018.03.01

随机翻阅

《表4 彩礼范围：彩礼返还的法律问题研究——以中国裁判文书网的案例为例》 《表1 无缝管挤压三维模型相关参数》 《表4 因子特征值和方差贡献表》 《表4 设计变量对分离最小间隙响应的灵敏度系数》 《表4 两组患者激素水平比较(±s)》 《表6 不同结晶温度时KDP收率及质量分析》 《表4 电力作业违章事故事件大数据案例信息熵均值》 《表5 自我控制成绩的方差分析》 《表1 杂质Ro16-8652、杂质Ro40-1021待测溶液稳定性》 《表1 两组患者治疗前后VAS评分比较Tab.1 Comparison of VAS scores before and after the treatment between the 2 groups》